Quantcast
Channel: PRI: Science, Tech & Environment
Viewing all 3123 articles
Browse latest View live

Bottled Canadian air, started as a novelty, takes off in China

$
0
0

Troy Paquette and Moses Lam started their company on a bit of a lark.

The Edmonton, Canada-based co-founders of Vitality Air put a sealed plastic baggie full of air from the Canadian Rockies online to see if it would sell.

“We came up with this idea of trying to sell fresh air in a baggie, just to see what the uptake would be on it, “ Paquette said. “Because everybody always says, who’s going to pay for air.”

Someone did, and they went on to bottle air and start selling it commercially about six months ago.

At first the company offered air from Banff National Park in Alberta as something of a novelty product.

But it caught on quickly in China, where residents of Beijing and other cities already wear face masks when they leave the house and buy air filters for their apartments to combat thick smog.  

Officials in Beijing put the city on its first “red alert” earlier this month, restricting traffic and cancelling schools to combat the smog.

Paquette said the company’s first 500 containers of fresh mountain air sold quickly in China, and they’re sending 4,000 more.  

“People are using it and they’re saying it helps them,” Paquette said.   

Paquette and his business partner capture the mountain air from Banff and bring it back to Edmonton to compress and bottle.

"Our product is very unique in that everything’s hand bottled,” Paquette said.

He added the company isn’t turning a profit yet due to the high overhead.  

Vitality Air markets the air as a lifestyle product, careful to avoid making any health claims about a product that hasn't been tested for medical benefits.

One bottle they offer contains roughly 150 breaths of fresh air and costs about $23 online, plus shipping costs. The air is compressed and can be inhaled through a facemask that comes with the bottle.  

Paquette said the company has been fielding questions lately about the sustainability of their business model, and whether compressing, packaging and shipping air around the world to remedy a pollution problem makes sense.

"What we’re doing right now is using as much recycled product as we can, as far as papers and cardboards, everything that we use is recycleable,” Paquette said.

He added the company is thinking about a bottle deposit program.

“We’re doing the best we can there,” Paquette said. “At the end of the day, it’s up to the end users to recycle.”


Should we use art or science to explore the origins or the universe?

$
0
0

On any given day, 2,000 scientists and engineers work at the European Nuclear Research Center (CERN) in Geneva, Switzerland.

They’re analyzing data coming out of the Large Hadron Collider, the world's largest particle accelerator, which is trying to recreate the Big Bang in a series of tunnels underground.

It's not the kind of place where you would expect to find artists. But since 2011, several groups of artists have been given the opportunity to work at the facility as part of CERN’s artist-in-residence program.

Each artist given access to CERN gets paired with a specific scientist who’s called their "inspiration partner." A recent partnership involved theoretical physicist Subodh Patil, and American sound artist Bill Fontana. 

Fontana had the idea to make the Large Hadron Collider into a sound sculpture — a work of art that has, in turn, inspired his partner scientist.

“If I was forced to say something about how I imagined a lot of artists, I would have said something to the effect that, you know, they’re creators, they make things. But Bill was kind of weirdly almost like a discoverer,” Patil says. “He would just be walking around with these accelerometers, which are these contact microphones, and whenever he'd find something that would really captivate him, he would be like, 'Oh my god,’ and then he'd sit down and record it. He had a very almost explorer-like streak about him.” 

Jan Peters, a German video artist joined the residency program in 2013. He was given access to CERN’s underground tunnels while the collider was turned off — something almost no one ever gets. He came back with about 100 hours of footage from inside the giant tunnels. Peters worked closely with Neal Hartman, an engineer who works on Atlas, one of the biggest experiments on the accelerator where the particles actually collide. Hartman was struck by the philosophical approach Peters took to his film project. 

“Even though his practice was in many ways the most straightforward — meaning, turn a camera on the device and observe it — in a way his question is the most philosophical. [He is] looking at what we do, what it means, what the people mean, how they relate to each other. And he's going to turn that into a film that will be very personal. Because that's what his work is about — why CERN matters, you know, to him,” Hartman says. 

There is important scientific work happening at CERN, and some of the world’s most talented and intelligent people are using formulas, giant machines, and experiments to answer questions about the origins of the universe. 

According to Peters, however, many of the important philosophical questions and discussions at CERN take place not in labs, but in places where people relax and come together.  

“My experience was that the moment when you are in touch with ideas of the beginning of the universe, that’s mostly in those conversations that take place in the elevator, or even more in the cafeteria,” Peters says. 

Hartman, for one, is a fan of the artist-in-residence program, and the way that artists are approaching the work at CERN. 

“We ask big questions in particle physics, and sometimes those things are a bit overstated,” Hartman says, “But the simple reality is, if you really start to think about it, we are trying to figure out where we came from.” 

This story first aired on PRI's Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen.

These are the science books of 2015 that you should be reading

$
0
0

Was there a science, technology, or environmental book from 2015 that made you think, laugh, or gape in amazement? Now’s the time to celebrate it.

Here are some of the best science books of 2015, as chosen by Pulitzer Prize-winning science journalist Deborah Blum and Brain Pickings editor Maria Popova. Have a favorite science read from 2015? Share it in the comments! See some other reader and listener suggestions at ScienceFriday.com.

Maria Popova’s Picks for 2015:
(1) On the Move: A Life, by Oliver Sacks
Read more on Brain Pickings, listen to Oliver Sacks read an excerpt.

(2)The Invention of Nature: Alexander von Humboldt’s New World, by Andrea Wulf
Read more on Brain Pickings, listen to Andrea Wulf on SciFri, and read an excerpt.

(3) Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs: The Astounding Interconnectedness of the Universe, by Lisa Randall
Read more on Brain Pickings, listen to Lisa Randall on SciFri, and read an excerpt.

(4) The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage: The (Mostly) True Story of the First Computer, by Sydney Padua
Read more on Brain Pickings, listen to Sydney Padua on SciFri, and read an excerpt.

(5) The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time, by Jimena Canales
Read more on Brain Pickings

(6) Nature Anatomy: The Curious Parts and Pieces of the Natural World, by Julia Rothman
Read more on Brain Pickings

(7) Thunder & Lightning: Weather Past, Present, and Future, by Lauren Redniss
Read more on Brain Pickings, listen to Lauren Redniss on SciFri, and read an excerpt.

(8) The Blue Whale, by Jenni Desmond
Read more on Brain Pickings

Deborah Blum’s Picks for 2015:
(1) H is for Hawk, by Helen Macdonald

(2) The Hunt for Vulcan…And How Albert Einstein Destroyed a Planet, Discovered Relativity, and Deciphered the Universe, by Thomas Levenson

(3) The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness, by Sy Montgomery

(4) Plucked: A History of Hair Removal, by Rebecca Herzig

(5) Headstrong: 52 Women Who Changed Science—and the World, by Rachel Swaby

(6) The Shift: One Nurse, Twelve Hours, Four Patients’ Lives, by Theresa Brown, RN

(7) Thing Explainer: Complicated Stuff in Simple Words, by Randall Munroe
Listen to Randall Munroe on SciFri and read an excerpt.

(8) Rain: A Natural and Cultural History, by Cynthia Barnett

This story first aired as an interview on Science Friday with Ira Flatow.

It's Canada (again)! This time, it's helping to lead the way to fix the environment

$
0
0

When Canada's newly elected Prime Minister Justin Trudeau came to Paris to participate in the worldwide environmental negotiations, he brought with him a clear message: Canada is now backing federal and provincial climate protection.

For many Americans, it's the latest sign that Canada's new leader, from welcoming Syrian refugees to quelling Islamophobia, is somehow representing an American ideal as well.

On the environment, Trudeau is breaking with Canada's recent past. After a decade under conservative leader Stephen Harper, who pulled out of the Kyoto Accord and championed oil sands development, Trudeau promises to do things differently. Some parts of Canada have already begun a new way of pricing carbon, he pointed out.

“A lot of you may have noticed that over the past 10 years or so, Canada has been perhaps less enthusiastic than some about addressing climate change and its impacts,” Trudeau said. “But even though at the federal level we haven’t necessarily been strong and active, at the subnational level our provinces have stepped up. We have four different provinces, representing about 86 percent of the Canadian economy, that have actually moved toward putting a price on carbon.”

Trudeau also stressed an idea that encouraged many participants at the Paris environment conference: renewable energy development and energy efficiency are now engines of economic growth.

“We are now in a race to see who can create the best technology for renewable energy, for moving forward in a way that understands there is no longer a choice to be made between what’s good for the economy and what’s good for the environment,” he said at COP21.

Putting a price on carbon is a key stimulant of green energy development, Trudeau says. This strategy is now well underway in several Canadian provinces. The province of Québec has been a leader, working with other provinces and even US states.

“We’ve set up a carbon market, which we've successfully linked to the one set up in California — creating the largest carbon market in North America — and we've been very successful at raising revenues,” says David Heurtel, Québec’s minister of sustainable development for the environment and the fight against climate hange.

Québec’s carbon market has raised close to a billion dollars, nearly a third of their target of $3 billion by 2020, Heurtel says. The money is reinvested entirely in Québec's Green Fund, which funds adaptation and mitigation measures like improved public transit, electrification of transportation, investments in renewable energy and development of the clean tech sector.

“Our carbon market is directly linked with our emissions reduction targets,” Heurtel says. “The current market allows us to achieve those reductions and is also a tool for economic development to transition out of a fossil fuel-based economy to a cleaner economy.”

The carbon pricing plan works like this: any major industrial company that emits more than 25,000 tons of CO2 per year, is, by law, automatically integrated into the carbon market. If the company wants to continue to emitting over 25,000 tons, it has to buy carbon credits.

Right now, the price is $17 Canadian per ton, which is about $12 or $13 US. And the price has been rising, Heurtel points out. In 2013, the price was closer to $10 Canadian.

“That’s the basis of a successful carbon market,” Heurtel explains, “because it creates the incentive for the private sector to change their ways. If a company buys carbon credits and then invests in cleaner technologies, then it can sell the unused credits on the open market and actually make money ... and if the company also reduces emissions, it doesn’t have to buy as many credits." 

Nobody was talking about carbon pricing in Canada five or 10 years ago, Heurtel says, but now five provinces, representing over 80 percent of Canada’s population, are looking seriously at carbon pricing.

A possible next step for Canada is working to integrate its system with the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a group of nine northeastern states in the US, including all four states that border Québec.

“There have been exchanges between WCI, which is the entity that governs the Québec-California market, and RGGI, to see if there could be some preliminary ways of aligning both markets,” Heurtel says. “So that's very exciting news.”

Washington State and Oregon are also interested in establishing carbon pricing or carbon markets that could be linked with the Québec-California model, Heurtel adds.

Mexico has also shown interest. Premier Couillard of Québec and Mexico’s president signed a Memorandum of Understanding on October 12 stating that both Québec and California would explore with Mexico the possibility of linking Mexico's carbon market, which should be online by 2017, with the Québec-California model.

“There is a lot of momentum,” Heurtel says. “There are a lot of things going on in the right direction. So it's a pretty exciting time right now.”

Heurtel disagrees with those who criticize carbon pricing as a way of leaving the door open to burning more carbon.

“That has not been our experience — quite the contrary,” he says. “Setting up the cap and trade system in Québec has helped us effectively reduce remissions and has effectively also helped business transition out of fossil fuel-based technologies and develop new technologies. They factored in the cost and they saw that there are actually opportunities for growth. Our economy now is positioning itself to be a leader in exporting these new technologies around the world.”

This article is based on an interview that aired on PRI's Living on Earth with Steve Curwood

How virtual reality might change the world

$
0
0

Until recently, virtual reality was the stuff of science fiction. But last year, Facebook placed a large bet on the future of the medium when it bought Oculus Rift, the leading virtual reality technology company.

Oculus VR will start selling its affordable, state-of-the-art setup early next year, and Samsung has just released a $99 version of its Gear VR headset.

Some analysts and artists are beginning to wonder what virtual reality as a consumer product will mean for the future of storytelling. Obviously there will be markets for gaming — and pornography. But, for some directors, the medium has more idealistic applications.

Chris Milk, who over the last decade has directed music videos for artists like Kanye West and Arcade Fire, is one the first to explore virtual reality film making. In fact, he has invented a VR camera that is really just a sphere-shaped cluster of Go Pro cameras strapped together on a tripod, pointing in every direction. 

He’s used his camera to make a full-fledged VR film about a Syrian girl named Sidra who was living in a refugee camp in Lebanon. The film takes viewers inside her family’s tent, following her to school and to the sand patch where she plays soccer with her friends. But directing for virtual reality is nothing like what Milk learned in film school. 

A still from Vrse.works’ virtual reality film, “Clouds over Sidra,” produced for the United Nations by Gabo Arora and Chris Milk.

Credit:

Courtesy of Vrse.works

Jeremy Bailenson, who directs the Stanford lab, says that’s because shooting in 360 degrees makes it impossible to focus the viewer’s attention on any one thing. “Directors are brilliant because they tell you when to look and where to look. In VR, I get to look wherever I want.”

The virtual reality medium is immersive in a way regular film isn’t.  

“I've spoken to people who have seen the [Sidra] film who actually have been to a camp and felt that it actually gave you a sense of it was like to be there,” Milk says. 

What’s more, Milk noticed that filming with his newly-invented spherical camera has a different effect on film subjects than a normal camera does.

“We were just sticking it places and people were like 'Oh cool!’ It doesn't feel the same as if another person was standing two feet away from them,” Milk says. 

For film viewers, a 360-degree immersive experience gives them a new sort of empathy and understanding of the film subjects. 

“It turns out that this lesson, when you walk a mile in someone's virtual shoes, when you actually wear their body, this resonates,” Milk says. 

Milk believes the VR medium has the powerful ability to change the way people think about far-away experiences, situations, and people. Since the Sidra movie, Milk and his team have also filmed inside an Ebola clinic in Liberia. And he learned a lot on a project with the New York Times and Google about child refugees. 

“I do think that there's a tremendous amount of good that can come out of this medium. There's something really powerful about sitting in the same room with another person and hearing them tell you their story. The way that you feel about them changes. You feel their humanity in a different way, you feel it in deeper way. It's different than television or from the radio. It's different from cinema, it’s different from literature,” Milk says. “[How exactly it’s different] — that's what we're trying to figure out.”

This story first aired on PRI's Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen.

UK flooding is 'like stepping back 100 years'

$
0
0

More rain is in the forecast for later this week in the north of England and that is terrible news for people there.

Parts of Cumbria, Lancashire and Yorkshire are under water. Several thousand people have been evacuated from their homes. Some roads remained closed on Monday. Utility services struggled to stay online. Hundreds of businesses have been forced to shut their doors.

Along with local emergency services, uniformed soldiers with the British army were also deployed to lend a hand. 

A record amount of rainfall during the month of December was one reason for the floods that have submerged parts of the cities of Leeds, Manchester and York. 

British Prime Minister David Cameron put on a pair of green rubber boots and visited flooded areas in York on Monday and pledged more than $400 million in funding for flood prevention. “But that’s of no comfort for the people who’ve been flooded here,” he told the BBC. Cameron went on to praise the emergency response to the crisis.  

Some residents in northern England say that funding priorities are part of the problem. City council leader from Leeds, Judith Blake has suggested the Cameron government is guilty of allocating fewer resources for things like flood defenses to less affluent cities in the north compared to those in the south.

“I think we’re beginning to feel that very strongly. At that time there were other flooding events in the north that didn’t get anywhere near the support that we saw going into Somerset,” Blake said.

One local resident from York whose apartment was surrounded by water spoke to Cameron and thanked the prime minister for his efforts. But Chris Wardle said the flooding was, “like stepping back 100 years.”

“Someone, from Prime Minister to the council, really needs to sort out flood defenses in the city center,” he added.

Water levels appeared to come down on Monday. But the cleanup is only beginning. And a fresh storm, officially named Storm Frank, is expected to bring more rainfall in the coming days.  

A British astronaut shared his concern for those impacted by the flood and offered this view of the region from space.   

The most important work at COP21 may have happened out of the spotlight

$
0
0

At the Paris climate conference, the primary focus was on the negotiators who represented more than 190 countries working to hammer out an agreement. But an equally, if not more, important process happened outside the main event.

“Across a spectrum of issues, often outside of the convention, remarkable working coalitions have now formed and are making very substantial pledges,” explains Rachel Kyte, the World Bank’s special envoy for climate change.

These "coalitions of the working," as Kyte calls them, were made up of governments, companies from across different sectors of industry and civil society organizations who came together on their own. Their motivating belief, says Kyte, is the need to act on climate disruption now and not wait for a global consensus.

One example is the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, which primarily addresses short-lived pollutants like black carbon, methane and hydrofluorocarbons. This group includes companies with extended supply chains that are pledging to end deforestation and work toward sustainable energy for all, no matter what the official agreement says.

Another group includes more than 80 countries and thousands of individual groups and private companies pledging to deliver clean energy, to increase the amount of renewables in the global energy mix and to create a revolution in energy efficiency. The World Bank is a partner is many of these coalitions, Kyte says.

“We see how climate change is threatening our underlying mission to end poverty and build prosperity,” she explains. “So in responding to our client’s needs — developing countries and private sector — we've had to completely rethink the way we do our business.”

The World Bank is also an important provider of global climate finance on its own. The bank recently agreed to increase its [climate] financing by 40 percent. By 2020 it expects to channel $29 billion worth of public finance every year to developing countries. This is separate financing from the Green Climate Fund, Kyte notes, which hasn't met expectations.

A major source of private co-financing emerged when Bill Gates announced the creation of the Breakthrough Energy Coalition, a group of billionaire entrepeneurs commited to funding innovations that "will result from a dramtaically scaled up public research pipeline linked to truly patient, flexible investments committed to developing the technologies that will create a new energy mix." Gates has promised to spend $1 billion dollars of his own money supporting this effort.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates that about $62 billion is disbursed to developing countries grappling with climate change. About half of that comes through multinational development banks, including the World Bank.

Not enough of that $62 billion dollars is targeted for adaptation, Kyte says.

“Remember, everything we're negotiating in Paris is for 2020 on,” she points out. “This is 2015. We have an immediate need to boost financing for resilience and adaptation now, over the next five years, because we know that the climate impacts are going to become more and more profound every year. We are going to lose lives, and we're going to lose enormous amounts of GDP growth. So every investment that we can make in resilience will save us funding in relief and reconstruction, and it will save lives too.”

The World Bank recently released a report that said it expected another hundred million people in severe poverty by 2030 as a result of climate change. Kyte thinks this can be avoided, but it's going to take some hard work and serious commitment.

“We believe aggressive action to mitigate climate change and concentrated investment in adaptation can make those numbers a distant threat rather than a reality,” she says. “But to achieve this means that countries have to do the things that are not rocket science — and they need to do them soon and need to do them well."

“So, we want to see carbon prices in all economies. We want to see harmful subsidies removed in both fossil fuels and agriculture. We want to see smart economic management, with long-term consistent signals that will allow the private sector and public procurement to move into lower carbon solutions," she says. “It's not easy. No country has ever walked this path before. But a lot of the tools that are needed are available to government already, and it requires political will to use them.”

This story is based on an interview that aired on PRI's Living on Earth with Steve Curwood

How he caught the wave ... of predicting surf

$
0
0

It all begins with a storm — a typhoon sweeping past the Philippines, a tropical cyclone growing near Australia, or a hurricane building along the Mexican coast. These are sources of swell, an undulation that can trundle mile upon mile across the open ocean.

As it approaches shore, wind, bathymetry (the topography of the sea floor) and obstacles such as islands or jutting peninsulas all shape the way the swell transforms into a wave that crashes on the beach.

For surfers, catching a suitable wave was long an exercise in intuition and luck. These days, however, they can tap a suite of tools that help take the guesswork out of the game. In addition to HD cameras now set up at surf spots around the world, there are also websites and apps that cull atmospheric and oceanic data from a variety of sources — including NASA satellites, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) buoys, and wind anemometers — in order to provide timely surf forecasts.

Jake Kean Mayman, who lives in Venice Beach, California, is one surfer who’s found this influx of tools useful. He admits that he’s “kind of gotten addicted” to websites that help decipher all the available data on surf and wind conditions, and to the webcams that reveal the status of his preferred breaks.

For the edge that this technology has given them, surfers like Kean Mayman largely have a surfer named Sean Collins to thank. With only a couple meteorology courses at Long Beach Community College under his belt, but extensive time spent studying the subject on his own, in 1985 Collins was recruited to join Surfline, the nation’s first commercial surf prediction center geared toward surfers.

He grew the company into a global enterprise that provides weather and forecasting services not just to surfers, but to all lifeguard agencies in California, as well as the Coast Guard, US Navy SEALs, the National Weather Service and television and movie production companies, among other entities, according to a profile on Surfline.com about Collins, who passed away in 2011 at the age of 59.

“[Collins] completely changed what it means to be a surfer,” says Chris Dixon, the founding online editor for Surfer magazine who first met Collins in 1996. “Surfers used to be perceived as beach bums because they had to drop everything when waves came. If you were going to be an addicted, devoted surfer, you couldn’t have a boyfriend or girlfriend or a steady job. He made it possible to know when waves were coming and altered the definition of who surfers are.”

Collins grew up in Southern California and started surfing at Seal Beach in Orange County when he was just 8. In those days, the only way for surfers to figure out if a wave was worth the ride was to either test the waters for themselves, or wait for a phone call from friends already scoping the scene, says Dixon, who’s also the author of Ghost Wave: The Discovery of Cortes Bank and the Biggest Wave on Earth.

As a teenager, Collins spent time sailing with his father, which buoyed his interest in meteorology, according to his son, AJ Collins. In the 1970s, Collins became engrossed with surf prediction, poring over charts for clues into the nature of swells. “Part of [my father’s] aim was to refine his understanding of his environment,” says 25-year-old AJ.

To hone his formulas, Collins also studied the research of famed physical oceanographer Walter Munk, who pioneered wave prediction techniques to help Allied forces better execute amphibious missions during World War II. And Collins made his own surf observations.

He would sit atop his house in Seal Beach, peering out at the Pacific, according to Dixon. From that vantage point, he’d keep track of how large the waves were, how many arrived in sets, the number of seconds between the waves (called wave period), and the directions from which they were coming, for example. But to really understand why and how the waves arrived when they did, Collins would then compare what he saw on his hometown beach with week-old weather reports from other locales in the Pacific Ocean.

Understanding weather events in far-flung regions was a key step in developing prescient wave models, according to Dixon. “Sean had this amazing ability to take disparate sources of information and turn them into a forecast,” he says.

After informally fielding calls for several years from friends seeking surf tips, Collins realized there was a need and market for forecasting services. That’s when he helped found the first iteration of Surfline, a call-in surf forecasting phone service.

Two years later, Collins left the business and started a rival company, Wavetrack. But he later bought out Surfline and merged the two companies. Surfline’s current home base is fitting: Huntington Beach, California, also known as Surf City, USA.

In 1992, Surfline expanded from providing forecasts by phone to disseminating them via fax to a few spots around Southern California. During that time, Collins and his team relied on weather charts, observational data, wave physics equations, and Collins’ own algorithms to make their predictions. Because of inherent uncertainty in their forecasts, however, “there was a lot of anticipation and a lot of nerves” the night before monster waves had been predicted to arrive, recalls Surfline’s chief meteorologist Mark Willis, who joined the company in 2000.

Still, WaveFax, as the product was known, was a game changer for surfers, according to Dixon. “The copy machine at Surfer would just get burned up with this,” he says. “It’s tough to express how important it was when that WaveFax came in, because that’s how we planned our lives.”

These days, those intermittent faxes are a quaint memory. Now surfers can go to Surfline’s website, which Collins launched in 1995, or open its app and hone in on local conditions — including wave height, wind direction, tide, swell — for 3,690 beaches around the world, from Santa Monica, California, to Skagen, Denmark. With a paid subscription, users can access even more detailed data and get predictions for swells more than two weeks away.

The accuracy of Surfline’s forecasts have improved, too, as a result of advancements in wave modeling techniques, a proliferation of observational ocean data, and importantly, the development of LOLA. That’s the company’s predictive swell-modeling tool, which crunches real-time data on ocean conditions to provide forecasts on weather, surf heights, and wave period, among other things. Collins began developing this proprietary computer program in 1999 with William O’Reilly, an oceanographer with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography who continues to work with Surfline as a lead wave modeler.

The data feeding into LOLA comes from myriad sources, including NOAA, offshore buoys, NASA satellites — and Surfline’s nine full-time forecasters. “We basically apply our own secret sauce to make an accurate surf prediction,” says Willis. “There’s still a lot of uncertainty in the models.” In other words, Willis’ team tweaks the data LOLA’s churning out in order to incorporate local knowledge about the peculiarities of individual surf spots, including expanses of reef, ocean floor depth and features such as islands or offshore canyons. (Not all of the forecasts on Surfline’s website incorporate human wisdom, however. Some are entirely automated.)

Surfline’s forecasters also vet their predictions by cross-checking with other ocean weather tracking systems. For example, Willis recalls a scenario where LOLA was showing 30-foot waves for a swell generated by a storm near Japan and moving toward Hawaii and Micronesia. The team then consulted a NASA satellite — which just so happened to pass over the exact point that LOLA had measured — and observed that waves in the same spot were 35 feet high. Not too shabby, but they corrected their forecast accordingly. “We can adjust a forecast on the fly,” says Willis.

The team can spot-check predictions, too, by inspecting surf conditions on the beach, using their extensive system of HD cameras, the first of which Collins installed about two decades ago. Dixon remembers when Collins sent him a link to view a camera at Huntington Beach. “My jaw hit the floor,” he says. “To be able to look in real-time at the waves at Huntington Beach in the mid- to late-1990s was a complete game changer.”

Surfline operates 210 (and growing) HD cameras spread along coasts across the globe — the largest number of any surf forecasting company. “As the sun starts to come up, we start to look at the cameras and we see how the surf is all up and down the coast,” says Jonathan Warren, another Surfline forecaster. He gets up around dawn so his first surf report of the day for his beaches around Southern California are posted within 20 minutes after sunrise. He checks what the models are saying, then double checks using the HD cameras in order to produce the most accurate rundown of surf conditions.

As a surfer, Warren has a personal stake in ensuring that their models match what’s happening at the beach. “If the surf looks like crap we go back to sleep, but if it looks good, we’ll grab our boards and validate it.”

While Surfline was a pioneer in surf forecasting, it’s not the only game in town. Other surfing organizations and companies also operate HD cameras and offer predictions, many free of charge. Surfer Kean Mayman, for instance, often relies on the cameras operated by SwellMagnet.com, a Southern California-based company. And MagicSeaweed.comSwellinfo.com, and SURFING magazine offer surf predictions, as does Stormsurf.com, which surfer Mark Sponsler founded in the mid-’90s.

“Surfline surely has more competition than they did,” says Dixon, “but I think the reason people still subscribe to them is because their forecasts are generally considered to be the most reliable and definitive.”

A surfer named Adam in northern Los Angeles and Santa Barbara checks Stormsurf and SURFING magazine’s SwellWatch, but he also pays for a subscription to Surfline and has been using the site for the last five years. “I need to know if I need to clear my schedule on Sunday and blow everything off,” he says.

Despite the appeal of available data and HD cameras, however, some surfers scoff at the idea of relying on a website or an app. Surfing “takes it roots really seriously, [and] it is always striving for this romantic notion of the past,” says surfer Kean Mayman. “And that’s why you hear people criticize the fact that we do have too many technology options.”

Meanwhile, AJ Collins, who is a competitive surfer himself, sees all surfers as data collectors in their own way. “Some people collect data just by looking at the ocean. Some people collect data by looking at the data itself,” he says. Ultimately, “each surfer has their unique connection with the ocean.”

This story first aired as an interview on Science Friday with Ira Flatow.


Why energy-saving settings may be bad for the environment

$
0
0

Volkswagen’s deceptive engine controls, uncovered a few months ago, gave its cars a dual personality: one for everyday operation and a secret, greener one used to rank higher than warranted on vehicle emissions tests. Regulators in the US and Europe are now examining whether some television manufacturers similarly misbehaved, programming their screens to detect a standard video test clip, dial down their brightness and thus cheat on energy consumption tests.

While action deliberately aimed at providing deceptively favorable information about environmental impacts could obviously make a person cynical about a company’s claims, efficiency advocates see similar risk hiding in the open in the “eco” buttons popping up on a wide array of products, from automobiles and TVs to dishwashers and water heaters.

The multiple energy personalities in today’s devices present complex, ill-defined and often confusing options for consumers and regulators to consider. “It’s not simply on and off anymore,” says Noah Horowitz, who runs the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Center for Energy Efficiency.

While eco buttons and modes allow consumers to set their devices for lower power consumption, in many cases they also degrade the quality of service the products provide. As a result, eco buttons, which can promise savings of 10 percent or more when they’re deployed, may have little real impact on energy consumption. “It’s good for selling a product to offer an eco mode,” says Rainer Stamminger, an energy expert at the University of Bonn in Germany. “But in reality, I fear they’re not often used.”

And much as the cheat devices made VW car buyers think the product they were purchasing was more environmentally friendly than it really was in actual use, consumers may be misled when eco buttons and modes enable manufacturers to score top marks in government-mandated energy labeling programs. “You may not see the energy savings that you were expecting to see because the tests are done in conditions that don’t reflect reality,” says Christoforos Spiliotopoulos, an energy policy officer with Brussels-based product standards advocacy group ECOS.

Eco-Button Loophole

I got my first glimpse of what Spiliotopoulous and his colleagues call the “eco-button loophole” two years ago when I set up a new TV emblazoned with the logo for ENERGY STAR, a mark of excellence maintained by the US Environmental Protection Agency. In fact, the preset energy-saving mode that had earned my TV its ENERGY STAR credential delivered a drearily dim picture. Its efficiency promise went out the window as I set the TV to another preset mode called “Movie” that uses about 10 percent more power.

It turns out that my experience is widely shared. Consumer Reports noted in 2014 that many TVs qualify for ENERGY STAR by employing a power-saving mode that “can result in a dim or washed-out picture.” The magazine endorsed my solution, suggesting the switch to “Movie” mode for “a natural-looking picture.” HomeTheaterReview.com concurred last September, advising readers to dump the “ridiculously dim Standard mode” created for ENERGY STAR.

Katharine Kaplan, who leads the EPA team that develops ENERGY STAR’s specifications, says that is worrying feedback, since one of her program’s founding tenets is that certified products should deliver as good or better all-around performance than the competition. Kaplan says EPA has responded, adjusting its TV specifications twice in the past three years to protect against manufacturers using dim settings to win efficiency ratings. The EPA’s October 2015 update defines, for the first time, an absolute minimum brightness for standard home viewing.

Drivers and Dryers

Eco-mode performance degradation is a turnoff in other products as well. Consider automobiles, where an increasing array of models come equipped with a console button promising fuel savings by dampening vehicle acceleration.

Jack Barkenbus, a political scientist at Vanderbilt University’s Climate Change Research Network, admits to seldom pressing the eco button in his Nissan Leaf: Motoring with the button pressed, he says, is akin to “trying to drive through molasses.” He suspects that, as with my TV experience, he is not the only one forgoing an eco option’s promised energy savings.

“If the eco label comes with a trade-off in performance, the public isn’t buying,” Barkenbus says.

The good news with eco buttons in cars is that no one is being misled. EPA rules require buttons-off operation when testing cars’ fuel economy. And if people do press cars’ eco buttons, they really can save fuel.

That wasn’t the case with clothes dryers, according to 2011 tests by the NRDC: They discovered two dryers’ eco modes left clothes damp, requiring a second run through, which negated any energy savings.

Consumer Distrust

Such disappointing experiences breed consumer distrust, with sometimes ironic outcomes. Consider Europe’s efforts to make dishwashers more efficient. The European Commission’s Ecodesign program mandates that each dishwasher offer a “reference” cycle that cleans an average load of dishes with minimum energy and water use. But a sudsy debate has erupted since 2011, when European standards body CENELEC instructed manufacturers to name that official reference cycle “Eco” on their dishwasher control panels.

Defending dishwashers’ regulated eco button is Milena Presutto, the senior researcher at Italian energy research agency ENEA, who drafted Europe’s legislation covering dishwashers. She says that while eco modes of the past could not always handle normally soiled dishes, today’s standards assure consumers that pressing the eco button will clean everyday dishes with the efficiency promised on the machines’ energy labels. “That’s the issue we wanted to solve,” says Presutto.

The problem, say consumer groups, is that users may distrust the label and choose another cycle. Their concern is supported by a large market study by Stamminger and his colleagues published this year — one of the few to date examining how consumers relate to eco modes. The survey of dishwasher use in several thousand German households found that most shy away from eco cycles. “They are used for less than 20 percent of dishwashing cycles,” says Stamminger.

The net result could be that European dishwashers are using more energy than necessary, since manufacturers focus their engineering efforts on perfecting the legally mandated reference cycle.

Topten International Group, a Zürich-based consumer product rating and advocacy organization proposed a solution: Test and regulate dishwashers based on a cycle labeled “Normal” or “Standard,” rather than what Topten calls “the rather exotic eco cycle.”

Stamminger suggests another solution: better education. He is calling on European governments to back up the Ecodesign program with advertising that encourages consumers to press the eco button. “Eco mode is not sufficient if it’s not used,” he says. “What is needed is to standardize the eco mode and have a big public campaign as well.”

Worth Saving

NRDC’s Horowitz says eco modes that actually reduce energy use are worth saving, even when they trade a bit of convenience for enhanced energy efficiency. The same eco button that takes the fun out of driving for some, or renders a TV lifeless for me, may be just fine to others. Sometimes, he says, it’s simply a matter of context. An eco cycle on a clothes dryer that runs for two hours at low temperature to save kilowatts may be a nonstarter if one is running multiple laundry loads to keep a family clean, but it could work great for a single load. “If you’re going out to a movie, you don’t care [if the laundry’s done quickly] and you should have the option to save energy,” Horowitz says.

Household energy consumption already is beginning to decline in many countries, thanks to better insulation and more efficient appliances. Eco modes, says Horowitz, can help accelerate that. “We can drive that trend even further if we take proper advantage of these settings and capabilities,” says Horowitz.

For the responsible consumer, this means giving those eco buttons a fair try, when they are available, to see if the results fit your expectations. You can even do a few measurements to see how much energy is at stake. (I checked the impact of mode switching on my TV by plugging it into an easy-to-use device called the Kill A Watt meter.)

And what if the eco buttons come up short? Think about letting the world know about it. One of the biggest challenges facing rating programs such as EPA’s ENERGY STAR, academic researchers and consumer advocates alike is a dearth of feedback on how consumers actually use products. Those efficiency wonks are dying to hear from you.

This story was first published by Ensia, an environmental magazine based at the University of Minnesota.

Why tech-savvy Indians are mad at Mark Zuckerberg

$
0
0

Free access to the Internet might sound like a nice holiday gift — especially in developing countries, where billions of people still can’t get on the web.

But in India, when Facebook tried to give away limited Internet access through its “Free Basics” app, activists said they didn’t want it. In fact, they attacked the social media giant for violating the core values of the World Wide Web.

India’s government seems to think that those activists have a point. This month, Indian regulators placed a temporary ban on “Free Basics.” Today, Egypt blocked the app too.

Facebook has offered lofty explanations for its “Free Basics” service, which is a rebranded version of a project called “Internet.org.” Mark Zuckerberg argued that increasing access to the Internet is a “moral responsibility.” He called “Free Basics” a first step toward “digital equality.”

However, Facebook’s app may be more about marketing than morality, according to Bhaskaran Raman. “They’re pitching this whole thing as if it’s charity for the poor,” says Raman, who’s a professor at the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. “That doesn’t sit well with me.”

If Facebook solely aimed to expand Internet access for the poor, says Raman, “you can provide free basics in a lot of other ways. For example, Facebook can just provide 50 or 100 megabytes for their data connection free every month.” Instead, “Free Basics” allows access to only those online services that agree to share data with Facebook. That means no Google, Amazon or Twitter.

Raman and his fellow campaigners recently helped write a petition that accuses Facebook of violating the principles of net neutrality, which could create unfair competition online.

The debate over Internet access in India might seem a little esoteric. But according to Vichal Misra, a professor of computer science at Columbia University, India is looking pretty attractive to tech companies. “India added 100 million Internet users last year,” Misra says.

India’s influence in the tech world, says Misra, might also affect the global fight for net neutrality. “I think this is ground zero for that battle, and whatever ends up happening in India will definitely act as a precedent for other parts of the world.”

Facebook is trying to adapt its service to meet the needs — and demands — of its potential users. But regardless of what happens to “Free Basics,” the debate in India has made it clear that the developing world remains a relatively untapped market of future Internet users. Both companies and citizens will have to fight over how that market should work.

Saving the planet depends on saving its tropical forests. Can we do it?

$
0
0

Saving the world’s tropical forests was a central element of the climate change agreement that emerged from COP21 in Paris. Delegates from all nations seem to have finally reached consensus on one point: Saving the planet from climate catastrophe is not achievable without also saving the Earth’s tropical forests.

One way of accomplishing this that has been around for a decade is the UN-REDD program.

As a tool for mitigating climate change, REDD has been called “the ultimate way to have our cake and eat it, too.” Saving tropical forests has the potential to remove or reduce about one-third of the world’s carbon emissions — buying time for the world to transfer away from fossil-fuel based economies, maintaining much of the world’s biodiversity and empowering local indigenous cultures.

Up to now, unfortunately, REDD’s implementation has fallen far short of its goals.

REDD stands for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. The UN describes the program this way:

“It is an effort to create a financial value for the carbon stored in forests, offering incentives for developing countries to reduce emissions from forested lands and invest in low-carbon paths to sustainable development. REDD+ goes beyond deforestation and forest degradation, and includes the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.”

New research shows that the tropics could theoretically save a whopping four to six gigatons of carbon a year if deforestation is halted and the trees are allowed to grow back, according to Richard Houghton of the Woods Hole Research Center.

“[That] is enough to stabilize the concentration of carbon dioxide now and keep it stable as we come off of fossil fuels,” Houghton says.

But to make such sharp carbon cuts, the world would need to end its current business-as-usual practices almost immediately — that is, stop cutting and burning virgin forests, begin to restore them and drastically reduce the logging of plantation trees that are used for pulp and paper, Houghton says.

The main challenge to making REDD work is finding a way to reduce deforestation while at the same time promoting social and economic development, says Mariano Cenamo of the Institute for Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Amazon.

“As we know, the main driver of deforestation in most of these regions comes from the need for economic development — from agriculture, cattle ranching, mining and illegal logging,” Cenamo said. “To substitute another land use for these activities that generate revenue, we need investments, we need funds and we need financial support.”

About 20 percent of the world’s tropical forests are in indigenous territories, and many of these lands have changed little in hundreds if not thousands of years. The local communities are now developing and farming, but courts seldom grant indigenous people title to their lands. The REDD discussion has brought some clarity to this issue.

In 2013, the constitutional court of Indonesia ruled that customary land rights must be ceded back to local indigenous communities. “That is a mind-boggling decision,” says Dan Nepstad, a tropical biologist and REDD expert who heads the Earth Innovation Institute in San Francisco. “It has to be implemented, and that’s a big step — but the context for that was the REDD debate.”

But, as is so often the case, the human drive for short-term gain — in Indonesia, mostly in the form of rapidly growing palm oil forests that destroy millions of acres of tropical forest — continues to trump the planet’s need for long-term planning.

“I think there is nothing wrong with REDD, if the implementation puts indigenous peoples' rights as a precondition,” says Abdon Nababan of Indonesia, secretary general of Indigenous Peoples' Alliance of the Archipelago. “We have the same goals with REDD+ — to reduce deforestation and forest degradation. But if they put REDD into the hands of corporations, it will colonize our territory.”

Even after the constitutional court’s ruling, ownership of most of Indonesia’s forests is held by corporations that want to dry the nation’s rainforests and peat lands to create plantations for palm oil — and these industries are fiercely opposed to any change in support of indigenous peoples' rights, Nabadan says.

The agreement at COP 21 showed a new determination to use nature’s own best method of saving the Earth from the worst effects of climate change. But now, as the time for implementation is at hand, it’s still uncertain whether this time around humanity can make the difficult changes needed to do it.

This article is based on interviews that aired on PRI's Living on Earth with Steve Curwood.

Want to install solar panels but can't? No problem.

$
0
0

Coming up with a climate agreement in Paris last month, getting nearly 200 countries to commit to lowering their greenhouse gases, well, that was the easy part. Now nations have to actually achieve their targets to transition to a lower-carbon future, which includes investments in more renewable energy.

Here in the US, the solar industry got a big holiday gift at the end of 2015 — Congress extended an investment tax credit (ITC) to build new solar panels. For every dollar solar manufacturers spend, the government will give them 30 cents back through the end of 2019. After that, the credit tapers down. You and I can get the same deal for slapping panels on our roofs.

I looked into putting solar panels on my roof just outside of Boston. A company pulled up an aerial shot of my home on Google Earth, and minutes later said, no dice — a large tree is blocking the sunlight. Many of us living in dense urban areas are finding it challenging to go solar.     

“Just go out one day and walk around Boston and take a look at how many roofs have a large amount of space facing south. Not many,” says Henry Lee with Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.

That doesn’t mean we can’t own solar panels though. They just can’t be on our roofs. The panels can, however, be in places like a muddy field in the Massachusetts town of Fairhaven, near Cape Cod. There, workers are busy installing thousands of solar panels.

I walked around the field with Mark Slyvia — a managing director at BlueWave Capital, a Boston-based company that invests in so-called “community solar” projects.

“You see the sun is very much directed right down on these panels,” says Sylvia, admiring the field on a bright, sunny December day.

BlueWave works with many people who want to put up solar panels, but can’t. This field will service about 100 customers.   

“So the individual actually will be able to drive by this site and say, ‘I’m getting my power locally from this facility.’”

Here’s how this all works, the basics. You now own a few solar panels in this field and they pump electrons into the electricity grid. Due to federal tax rebates and incentives from the state of Massachusetts, your solar electrons are cheap. So, your utility says thanks for the electrons, here’s a discount.

“If you enter into an agreement for community solar, that will enable you to reduce your energy cost by 10 percent,” explains Sylvia.

So, if your bill is $100 now, you’d pay $90 with community solar.  

Besides Massachusetts, community solar is gaining traction in a handful of states providing extra incentives: New York, California, Minnesota and Colorado.

Here’s another nice thing about community solar: there’s no upfront capital cost. You don’t have to plunk down $10,000 or $20,000 to install panels on your roof. Your long-term savings, over many years, may be lower, but you don’t have to come up with that big chunk of money right now.

In order to make the community solar business model work though, you have to commit to it.  

“It’s a 20-year contract,” says Sylvia. That seems to be the standard in the nascent industry.

As a commitment-phobic person, I told Sylvia: that scares me. I asked him why I shouldn’t be scared.

“Because it’s a 20-year contract that commits you to reducing your electricity bill on an annual basis,” he says.

Workers are installing 3,500 solar panels in a field in Fairhaven, a town about 60 miles south of Boston.

Workers are installing 3,500 solar panels in a field in Fairhaven, a town about 60 miles south of Boston. 

Credit:

Jason Margolis

Other companies lock in a guaranteed rate for 20 years. The rate I was quoted, by NRG Home Solar, a competitor of BlueWave, looked like a sweet deal — today. But costs of solar panels have fallen substantially in the past few years, and I don’t want to be the sucker who locks in too early.

It’s fair to harbor some reservations, says Lee.    

“I think that solar costs are going to continue to go down, maybe not as dramatically as they have in the last few years, but they’re going to continue to come down. And as a result, I would be somewhat hesitant to enter into such a deal right now,” says Lee.

On the other hand, every month I wait, I’m paying more on my electricity bill. And I’m not helping the environment. These are questions I have the luxury to grapple with here in Boston. But they’re not the kind of calculations that most people are making in the developing world — they just want reliable energy.

With community solar, it’s cheaper to build a bunch of panels at once in a field, as opposed to going roof to roof. So, I asked Cory Honeyman, an analyst with GTM Research in Boston, a firm that covers the solar industry, if the community solar model could bring benefits to poorer countries.

“I think that community solar can, in theory, touch upon the broader best practices in economic development,” says Honeyman. “When you have a community solar project in an emerging economy, you get buy-in from the broader community to make sure that project is a success not just from the installation phase, but through the project's entire life cycle.”

Honeyman adds that the business model for community solar remains “a work in progress.” And the US tax credit extension won’t help much in the developing world. He estimates that the tax credit will help add 25 extra gigawatts of solar power in the US by the end of the decade — enough to power about 4 million homes. But the credit focuses on installation of solar in the US, not overseas. 

How do we save the Internet for history? This group is trying.

$
0
0

There is a building in northern San Francisco that looks like a cousin to the Acropolis in Greece. It used to be a Christian Science church.

Now, however, it houses 26 petabytes of digital information in a forest of blinking, heat-generating servers. Welcome to the Internet Archive headquarters. 

“The Internet Archive is part of the vision to build the Library of Alexandria, version 2,” says digital librarian Brewster Kahle. “We hit the record button on the World Wide Web in 1996. We take a snapshot of every web site and every web page on every website.”

The archive doesn’t just collect digital information. They also archive old video games, film and hardware. And they get a lot of traffic. Between two and three million users upload or download something from the archive every day. 

“What we want is the wackiness and the wildness of all the people participating in the big conversation that is the Internet,” Kahle says. 

The Internet Archive collects web pages at about one billion pages per week. Currently the collection consists of some 450 billion web objects.

“Which is just freaking huge,” Kahle says, “The Library of Congress's number of books is 28 million. We collect that in about, oh I don't know, six hours.”

The Internet Archive is unable to access all of the web, however. Information on Facebook and Twitter is closed to the public, and difficult for the archive to get. 

“You have to understand these are privately owned information assets,” says historian Abby Smith Rumsey. “People don't think of things that they put on Facebook or Twitter as belonging to somebody else because they come from us. But in fact they don't have ultimate control over this. ... We need more organizations that control information like Twitter, Apple, Google, to actually develop partnerships with public institutions, like the Internet Archive or the Library of Congress, so that they can be archived and made available to the public for the long term.”

The Internet Archive’s work involves not only collecting information, but figuring out new ways to store it, and constantly updating it to keep it available in relevant formats. 

“We have to be out there all the time not only gathering the stuff, but keeping it in formats and keeping it relevant,” Kahle says. 

This article is based on an interview that aired on PRI's Science Friday.

Want to be an astronaut? Here’s your chance.

$
0
0

For the first time since 2011, you can apply to be a US astronaut. The job listing went up last month at usajobs.gov

NASA chief and former astronaut Charles Bolden says the application requirements are not as complicated as you might think.  

“Believe it or not, it’s pretty straightforward,” Bolden says. “They have to have a bachelor's degree in a technical field. ... If they've already finished school and they're a doctor they're eligible. If they happen to be a pilot with an undergraduate degree, as long as they have a thousand hours in high performance jets, they're eligible.”

If the application is straightforward, however, the astronaut selection process is stringent.  

“That's when we start looking for special things like a demonstrated ability to do a spacewalk — and since I never did a space walk, and I've never been close to a space suit, I'm not exactly sure how we test that down at the Johnson Space Center,” Bolden says. But you also have to demonstrate language capability ... and then you have to be able to demonstrate agility — manipulating robotic apparatus. I didn't have to do that either. I doubt if I could be selected now.” 

Candidates selected in this current round of hiring will likely be going to lunar orbit and will do work to prepare the next round of astronauts for travel to Mars. 

“The new astronaut class — they're definitely going to fly on our commercial vehicles. They're not going to be selected to come to work until 2017, and that's the first year we're going to fly our commercial crew vehicles. So they will be among the first to fly on those,” Bolden says. “Their next stop is actually going to lunar orbit and then eventually they will be the trailblazers. They'll be the ones that are going to do all the development we need in order to send perhaps the class after them to Mars. Some of them will stay around and some of them may go to Mars, but they know coming in that their job is to be the trailblazers for the first Mars occupants.” 

Bolden, who is excited by NASA's new $19.3 billion budget for 2016, says the space program is focusing on both short- and long-term goals. 

“We hope that we will be prepared to move out into the into the vicinity of the moon as our next area of routine operations for NASA,” Bolden says. “But most of our international partners are right alongside us with the destination of Mars for humanity in the 2030s as our ultimate goal.”

This article is based on an interview that aired on PRI's Science Friday.

How we can shrink the environmental cost of moving our stuff from source to market

$
0
0

Much of the stuff around us at any given moment — be it product, commodity or raw material — was once on a boat. To get from wherever it was made or processed or harvested to wherever it’s used or consumed, all this stuff embarks on a seaborne journey around the world.

It happens thousands of times a day, on tens of thousands of vessels moving from port to port. Ships handle roughly 90 percent of global trade, nearly 11 billion tons of stuff per year.

Boats and ports are only a part of the picture. Airlines, railroads, trucks, warehouses, refrigerators, delivery people — the international system of goods movement is integral to the way we live in the 21st century. It also is a huge source of opportunity to reduce humans’ environmental footprint.

Ship Shape

The 11 billion tons of stuff shipped around the planet in 2014 is two-thirds more than what was moved in 2000. “Retail sales in the United States and across the world are increasing, in spite of all the economic cycles,” says Jean-Paul Rodrigue, a professor at Hofstra University and an expert in transport geography. “There’s more people, there’s more consumption.”

More than 47,000 big ships handle the bulk of this cargo, most of which (by weight) is made up of crude oil, iron ore, coal and other building blocks of the modern world. About 6,100 container ships carry the consumer goods we’re more likely to encounter and purchase — the televisions and socks and frying pans of day-to-day life. Transported around the world in standardized containers, it is this stuff that has dramatically transformed shipping from a dockside hustle of men hauling crates to a highly mechanized, multimodal system that can have a box of South American bananas off a boat and on sale in the US within hours.

The environmental cost of moving those bananas is, of course, complex. Big ships can use more than 110 tons of fuel oil per day and can take two weeks or more to traverse oceans. Shipping’s international nature makes it tricky to control; measures such as fuel regulations and emissions standards have long implementation periods and are slow to achieve greenhouse gas reductions and environmental goals.

Standards vary inside and outside so-called “emissions control areas” established by the International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency focused on shipping. The fuel used in ships, for instance, still contains low levels of sulfur and is highly polluting. and it’s been estimated that shipping accounts for 3 to 4 percent of human-caused carbon emissions. A recent report from the European Parliament estimated that number could rise as high as 17 percent by 2050.

In spite of this potential, shipping hasn’t been prioritized in any of the international agreements coordinated through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the latest agreement coming out of the COP 21 talks in Paris does not include stipulations on shipping or the high emissions caused by air freight.

Even so, there’s a reason all this stuff travels by boat. Aside from being the cheapest mode, it’s also the most carbon-efficient method of shipping: A big ship will emit about 0.4 ounces of carbon dioxide to transport two tons of cargo one mile. That’s roughly half as much as a train, one-fifth as much as a truck and nearly a fiftieth of what an airplane would emit to accomplish the same task.

“If ships were to move to cleaner diesel fuels, that would be a big reduction in emissions,” says Genevieve Giuliano, director of the METRANS Transportation Center at the University of Southern California. All of the major shipping lines are looking into new fuels and other sustainability measures. Earlier this year, Harvey Gulf International Marine became the first North American company to add liquefied natural gas, which produces less CO2 than conventional marine fuels, as a fuel for an offshore support vessel. And the first two cargo ships are set to begin using LNG for hauling cargo. Others are expected to follow, but transitioning ship engines on a wide scale will take time.

Still, progress is underway. From technological improvements such as retrofitted rudders and propellers to enhanced weather routing, shipping companies are eyeing many ways to improve their efficiency. “Freight is becoming more efficient by the day,” Giuliano says. “And in the short term, efficiency gains are going to be the biggest contribution to greenhouse gas reductions.”

For instance, newer ships have been designed to carry more without a proportional increase in fuel use. The biggest ship today is capable of transporting close to 20,000 of the type of containers typically carried by a semi-trailer on the highway, a huge jump from the roughly 2,500 that the first purpose-built containerized ships could carry in the 1970s. And, as this capacity has grown, ports have adapted to handle the influx.

“Ports are getting more and more automated and even robotized,” says Rodrigue. Ships can essentially plug into the ports where they dock, tapping into local power instead of idling their huge engines and burning hundreds of tons of fuel to sit still. Automated cranes can quickly unload and reload ships to reduce their time in port. And the same systems can quickly move those thousands of containers onto the trucks and trains that carry them off across the land.

Trucks and Trains

The era of huge container ships has led to the development of logistics hubs, with rail yards, truck bays and massive warehouses that receive, sort and redistribute all these goods. Transporting freight on rail is more energy efficient than transporting it by truck, says Asaf Ashar, an emeritus research professor with the University of New Orleans’ National Ports & Waterways Initiative.

But while it makes sense energy-wise to transport freight on rail for most mid- and long-range hauls in the US, for example, the flexibility of trucking and the wide geographic spread of the country means that most stuff is eventually moved to its point of sale or use by truck. According to the American Trucking Associations, trucks carry about 70 percent of the tonnage of stuff moving throughout the US annually, requiring 3 million trucks and more than 37 billion gallons of diesel fuel.

The companies doing all this trucking understand the scale of these operations, and their heavy environmental costs.

“It’s their bottom line. They want to find more fuel-efficient vehicles, and they do a lot of research into optimization algorithms for the routing of their trucks, from making sure they turn in one direction to minimizing wear and tear,” Rodrigue says. “When you have a fleet of thousands of vehicles and you’re able to save 1 or 2 percent of fuel or maintenance costs because of more efficient routing, it’s big money at the end of the year.”

And those solutions may not be far off. “I think that the first autonomous driving will take place in freight,” says Ashar. Automated driving can go slower for longer hours than a human driver, with big implications for fuel efficiency, Ashar says, so these companies — and potentially the environment— have a lot to save by reducing or even eliminating the human element. “Within a few years, there’s no need for a guy to sit in a big truck on the highway.”

Automation is seen by many as the biggest change coming to the system of goods movement, and it is already being implemented in a wide variety of ways. From the automated cranes moving containers to algorithms that schedule and route deliveries, automation is already having an impact on the overall efficiency of the goods-movement system, cutting both costs and energy demands.

Port automation has also been found to dramatically improve the use of land within port complexes, thereby prolonging or even eliminating the need to engage in environmentally costly expansion projects. And many expect the energy savings and efficiency gains of automated systems to play a much bigger role in reducing the overall environmental impact of the global goods movement system.

“Not anything within a year or two, but within a decade or so we could see very interesting stuff,” says Rodrigue. “A lot of vehicles will be self-driving, dropping stuff automatically at some specific, pre-set points, and the loading and unloading will be somehow automated, and people will just need to pick up their stuff.”

The reduced energy costs of automated vehicles and optimized routing and deliveries could mean we’ll need fewer energy-sucking vehicles on the road to get all the stuff we need.

Special Delivery

The question of how people ultimately get all this stuff is another dominant conversation in the goods-movement world. With the rapid growth of e-commerce and delivery options from retailers such as Amazon that promise packages within day or hours, moving all these individual packages from seller to buyer has created new challenges, particularly in terms of carbon emissions from delivery vehicles.

Ideas for addressing the congestion and energy requirements of the so-called “last-mile” issue range from centralized delivery boxes to cargo bicycles. Big companies like FedEx are investing in hybrid or all-electric delivery vehicles. Amazon is famously investigating the potential of delivery by battery-powered drones, which could reduce their reliance on traditional vehicles and their emissions. But many experts say the idea is just speculation at this point.

With the rise of 3-D printing, some technologists are looking at the potential of distributed manufacturing — factories interspersed throughout urban areas where machines can print whatever part or product a consumer could want or need, eliminating the need to ship a part across an ocean, or put it in a box in the back of a delivery truck.

Such fabrication labs may serve a niche audience, says Ashar, but they’re unlikely to be able to compete economically with the large-scale manufacturing system already in place. However, he doesn’t expect the current system to prevail in the long run, either. As the economic efficiency of shipping increases on sea and land, it will no longer make sense to concentrate huge factories in places like China. He sees more factories in more locations, with the parts and raw materials moving between them at less cost and with more energy efficiency than today.

“I don’t see less transportation,” Ashar says. “I see more transportation, but less energy consumption for that transportation.”

Efficiency gains and developments in automation may have the biggest influence on how the environmental footprint of our global system of goods movement evolves in the coming years. And even if self-driving trucks and delivery drones eventually revolutionize the movement of stuff over land, almost all of that stuff will still start its long journey on a boat.

This story was first published by our partners at Ensia, an environmental news magazine based at the University of Minnesota.


Could Russia be the first nation to send a woman to the Moon?

$
0
0

Deep space travel has always been something of a Russian specialty — at least the simulated kind. The Russian space agency has been testing the effects of deep space on its cosmonauts since the Soviet Union began flying missions to the stars in the 1960s.

And yet, amid all that history, only one simulation, in the year 2000, had a mixed-gender crew.

It didn't go well. A fight broke out among male crew members after one allegedly tried to steal a kiss from his female crewmate.

Things went much better last fall at Moscow’s Institute for Biomedical Problems for "Moon 2015.”

This time, the deep space experiment featured all women — the first all-female crew of its kind, Moon 2015 organizers claim.

The six Russian women underwent eight days of simulated space flight in a mock space capsule — the time it would take a real crew to fly to the moon and back. Or just about.

The eighth day was tacked on to simulate adverse weather conditions delaying re-entry and testing the crew’s reaction to stress. A different form of pressure came from the bank of cameras and microphones facing them upon their return to earth.

One by one the volunteer cosmonauts emerged, wearing red flight suits, from the capsule's hatch. The women — in fact, all scientists in their 20s and early 30s — saluted their superiors before being presented with ... flowers.

Now flowers — that's just Russian tradition. But in the run up to the experiment, Russian media also asked how they could manage on board without men? Without makeup? Shampoo? Cellphones? A promo video by the Institute showing the women posing for selfies didn't help matters.

Russian cosmonauts pose for a selfie.

Credit:

Courtesy of the Institute for Biomedical Problems

But, according to Sergei Ponomarev, the scientific director of the Russian Moon 2015 experiment, an all-female crew actually has a big advantage when it comes to deep space travel.

Namely, they get along.

"From what we've seen, the women worked entirely as one team. They had no conflicts,” says Ponomarev. “This is a really very good crew. With some additional training, this crew could go to the Moon, the International Space Station, Mars or other planets and do their work perfectly well," he adds.

Daria Komissarova, a senior researcher on the mission, called the experience inside the capsule an overwhelmingly positive one. Moreover, it reaffirmed some old childhood aspirations.

"I was always dreaming about space and spaceships ... but it was always a distant dream,” says Komissarova. “Now following this experiment,  I think it's one worth trying. And in Russia, I think we need to develop women into the space industry," she adds.

Traditionally women have had an iconic place in the space program here: In 1963, Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova launched into orbit under the call-name "Chaika"— the seagull — becoming the first woman in space.

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev seized the moment for what it was: a propaganda coup. Later, he appeared with Tereshkova on Red Square, where he chastised the US for discrimination against women in the Space Race.

“The bourgeoisie always claim that women are the weaker sex,” Khrushchev proclaimed. “Look at what our Soviet woman has shown to America's male astronauts. She has shown them who is who."

Tereshkova joked that with women now "storming the cosmos," the world's male cosmonauts “wouldn't be quite so lonely.”

But it was 19 years before the Soviets sent another woman into space.

A planned all-female voyage in 1985 was tabled over technical and, later, funding issues. In the post-Soviet era, only two more Russian women have been in orbit. By contrast, women make up some 25 percent of NASA’s current ranks of astronauts.

The Moon 2015 experiment isn't likely to change that in the short run. But it does come amid an effort by Russia to re-establish supremacy in the cosmos — presenting opportunities to close the gender gap in the stars.

President Vladimir Putin recently authorized an ambitious new space exploration plan. And the Russian Federal Space Agency, RosCosmos, is already constructing a new generation spacecraft to make a manned mission to the Moon in 2029.

While the crews of that mission won't be known for some time, Moon 2015 flight commander Elena Luchitskaya says she hopes their experiment will help the next generation of women cosmonauts secure their fair share of tickets for the ride.

“There should be equal spaces made for men and women ... particularly on deep space missions,” says Luchitskaya. “I hope things will change and that our experiment gives a small push to show that women are ready to handle these situations no worse than men.”

In fact, with 'the right stuff' to go where no woman has gone before.

Desperately seeking names for new elements

$
0
0

For anyone studying chemistry, there's big news: Four new entrants to the periodic table.

If you really can't remember that far back, the periodic table is that cool chart in science class that displays all the known chemical elements. Anyway, these four new elements are man-made and highly unstable.

And they don't really have names yet, just numbers: 113, 115, 117 and 118. So what will they be called?

"Traditionally, the names of elements have either been associated with people or with places, or perhaps some figure from Greek mythology," says Andrea Sella, a chemistry professor at University College London.

Greek mythology?

Yes. It's the element called, Promethium.

But the naming process is just that, a process. The BBC detailed it."Scientists who discovered them will start things off by proposing a name. But it will be down to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) to approve it. A special division of the US-based group has to accept the proposal. There is then a public review period of five months before the IUPAC council gets the final approval. Once it's ready, the name is announced in the scientific journal Pure and Applied Chemistry."

It's long. And there's plenty of horse-trading that happens along the way. But Sella thinks that elements need names. "I think it's very important to have names for things because that gives them an individuality and makes it possible for us, mentally, to distinguish one from the other," he says.

As for possible names?

Sella has plenty of ideas. "One would be 'Daltonium,'" he says. "John Dalton was an English chemist who really revived at the beginning of the 19th century the idea of the atom. I think think it would be nice to celebrate him."

But of course a chemist would want an element named after a fellow chemist.

My vote?

Monster Truckonium.

Science needs more awesome.

After six years in prison, an Iranian blogger sees a very different Internet

$
0
0

Hossein Derakhshan didn't expect to find himself in an Iranian prison, but that's where he spent from late 2008 to November 2014. He was sentenced to 20 years for political writing, as well as traveling to Israel, a 'hostile state' under Iranian law. Six years later, he's reemerged into a very different world. 

Before his arrest, Derakhshan was a powerhouse in Iranian blogging. He's credited with popularizing blogging, and jokingly referred to as "the blogfather" of Iran. 

While elements of his writing went against the government line, Derakhshan's work didn't always fit a typical profile that would attract the government's attention. He advocated in favor of Iran's nuclear weapons program, and wrote "...at its worst, [Iran] is way better than anything that the United States or anyone else can bring to Iran."

Yet some of his other work was more controversial. 

Last November the supreme leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei, pardoned and released Derakhshan. Six years in prison is a long time, and Tehran itself was greatly changed. The city had undergone a real estate boom, with hi-rise luxury apartments taking the place of older low rise buildings while SUVs and expensive cars flooded the streets.

Yet by far the biggest changes had been technological. Derakhshan entered prison a year after the first iPhone launched, when smartphones were a luxury item and Blackberry outsold the iPhone. 

"The biggest change was the emergence and the unbelievable, incredible popularity of smartphones." Derakhshan said " This was very new to me."

Seemingly overnight the smartphone revolution brought a digital cultural revolution. Practical tools, such as Google Maps, were widely available, and social networks moved from a portion of internet activity, to the dominant activity. "Everything is going through Facebook. It's become the biggest gateway for news and information for many, many people."

Derakhshan describes the death of the hyperlink as the death of the open web. In some countries Facebook is already moving to become an internet service provider

For a blogger, the death of the web, in favor of social networks and apps, comes hard. He says censorship has increased, but so have the number of people online. Apps now offer Iranians many more ways to communicate, and discuss ideas.

"When you see the breath of discussions and the diversity of the opinions that are expressed on these social networks, even from within Iran, you would be surprised." he says. "It's not perfect, it's not ideally open, but it's still happening."

As apps and online tools connect users with the outdoors, we walk a fine line between enhancing and degrading nature

$
0
0

Around 7:30 on a 60-degree morning in early November, Cornell University ornithologist Marshall Iliff parked in the upper lot of Millennium Park, outside of Boston, and started walking.

Over the next two hours, he covered less than a mile through a landscape of scrubby brush, grassy hillsides and beaver swamp. The sky was calm and clear, a good day for bird watching. Iliff saw 45 species that day, including 22 Canada geese, eight mourning doves, a great egret and a red-headed woodpecker — a tally he recorded in real time through an app on his iPhone.

Iliff doesn’t always use an Internet-connected digital device while in nature; sometimes he chooses to bring a notebook to record birds instead. But more often than not the smartphone comes along, and with it eBird, one of the apps his team at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology developed.

“It’s almost impossible for me to leave it behind these days,” he says. “It’s just become a way of life.”

Smartphone users today can choose from thousands of nature-themed apps that allow them to keep track of what they see, take guided walks through national parks, collect data that researchers can tap and more. In a similar vein, museums are using new technologies to add immersion and interactivity to exhibits, making nature accessible to anyone — even when they’re indoors.

For people who value the wilderness as a place for escaping the always-connected world, though, such advances raise an unsettling question: Does technology enhance our relationship with nature or pull us further away?

Glimpse Into the Future

To assess the extent of the nature–tech landscape, Paul Jepson, head of an interdisciplinary conservation research lab at Oxford University in the United Kingdom, and Richard Ladle, a conservation biogeographer at Federal University of Alagoas in Brazil, teamed up to analyze the million-plus apps offered on Google Play. In early 2013, they conducted a targeted search with 100 nature-related words — including wildlife, collecting, environment and wetland. Then they filtered out irrelevant hits, such as “Tiger Insurance.”

In total, they found just over 6,300 apps that had something to do with nature. Most were wallpapers, ringtones and games. Many others were digital versions of field guides and books.

But some offered a glimpse into the future of nature tech. In addition to eBird, the Cornell group has launched another app called Merlin Bird ID, which uses eBird data to help birders identify birds they spy in the field based on description, time of year, GPS coordinates and what’s been observed at that location in the past.

Innovations from other developers include an app called LeafSnap that uses visual recognition software to identify trees based on their leaves; Coral RKV, which uses a smartphone to turn two-dimensional posters of coral reefs into three-dimensional experiences; iNaturalist, which hosts a social network of nature observers, shares data with scientists and allows users to crowdsource species identifications; Cicada Hunt, an app that listens for an insect that might be extinct and automatically lets scientists know if any peep up; and iBats, which uses a plug-in microphone to record ultrasonic bat calls, processes that information to identify the species, and provides researchers with information they can use to monitor changes in biodiversity and other indicators of environmental quality.

Meanwhile at museums, the race is on to offer simulations of outdoor experiences, often for urban kids (and grown-ups) who aren’t able to experience the real thing. London’s Natural History Museum now features a virtual reality film that immerses viewers in a reconstructed ancient world, surrounded by sea creatures that lived more than 500 million years ago.

At the New York Hall of Science, an exhibit called Connected Worlds transports visitors into a virtual ecosystem they can manipulate to see how ecosystems influence each other over time and space. The hope is to send people home with a new appreciation for the balance of nature, says Stephen Uzzo, chief scientist at the museum. He and his team are now developing a tablet app to offer the same experience at home. They’re also trying to assess whether the exhibit actually changes the way people think or how they behave.

“One of the things we’re interested in investigating is whether any of this is generalizable,” he says. “Does it change attitudes toward day-to-day experiences, whether you walk in the woods and see a squirrel gathering nuts, or notice fruit from Chile or New Zealand in the grocery store?”

For Better or for Worse?

Whether apps and other technologies enhance or impede our ability to connect with nature is a complex question that is challenging to study. With apps like Merlin, Iliff suspects, gaining knowledge can help users take the first step toward caring.

“Once you put a name on a bird, you can learn more about its habitats and learn if it’s a bird in peril and why,” he says. “You can’t Google it until you know what it’s called.”

Even if they don’t increase individual users’ affinity for nature, apps like eBird, which compile entries into freely downloadable data sets, have other benefits. Available as a website since 2002 and an app more recently, eBird has so far collected some 280 million records and counting from around the world, Iliff says, which have contributed to time-lapse maps that show the timing of seasonal migration. Thousands of people have tapped in to the program’s database, he adds — including scientists, who have used eBird to inform more than 100 published peer-reviewed papers. Both eBird and iNaturalist make user observations available to an open-access database called the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, which now contains more than 570 million records.

Not everyone is so enthusiastic about the benefits of nature-based technologies, however. Those that offer shortcuts to species identifications and instructions about how to navigate through parks could cause people to forget how to appreciate the wonder of the natural world, says Bill Borrie, a professor of park and recreation management at the University of Montana. Data is important, he says, but collecting it shouldn’t come at the expense of noticing what’s happening around us.

“Being told what you should pay attention to and how you should pay attention to nature takes away from the mystery and the sense of discovery,” Borrie says, adding that there is value to experiencing the unpredictability and even discomfort of wild places. He once sat outside the IMAX movie theater at Yellowstone National Park and listened as tourists emerged into daylight after watching a hyper-real film of the park’s highlights.

“I remember hearing them say, ‘Wow, that was better than the park!’ and, ‘Mom, do we really have to go back to the park?’ I don’t want the outdoors to be disappointing to people.”

But Jepson sees it differently. Technology, he notes, has always mediated our relationship with nature: First came tool making and fire building, then books, binoculars and Gore-Tex. Cameras have long brought the world’s most remote places to coffee tables and television sets. Technology has built roads into wild places and the vehicles to get there. And few people find fault with using these tools to enhance our appreciation of the outdoors.

If anything, Jepson says, innovation lags behind the potential modern technology offers to engage users in nature.

“Everyone’s got smartphones — they’re not going to go away,” he says. “What an opportunity.”

The true balance may lie somewhere in the middle, in a still-elusive sweet spot where technology enhances nature without substituting for it. Still missing is an app that tells us when to look at the screen and when to look away.

This story was first published by our partners at Ensia, an environmental news magazine based at the University of Minnesota.

The joy of cooking — with cow dung

$
0
0

In December, our Across Women's Lives team traveled to Kenya to report on women #OwningIt in the business world.

For one of our stories, we drove north of Nairobi to meet Joseph Lentunyoi, a Kenyan agronimist working with Maasai women growing aloe for the international cosmetics company LUSH. 

Turns out, Lentunyoi has been doing more than just working with women's groups to improve their aloe yields. He's also been experimenting with ways to convert the Laikipia Permaculture Center where he works into a completely sustainable environment. And part of that means using cows to power the double-burner gas stove in the Center's kitchen. 

A Flexi Biogas system installed in Kenya

Credit:

International Fund for Agricultural Development

It's not as crazy as it sounds. More than 42 million households in China use biogas — gas produced through the fermentation of organic matter — as fuel for cooking and heating. And biogas use has been on the rise in Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda and South Africa with the introduction of cheaper, portable biogas systems like the one in this video. 

Today, with just $200 to $400 in construction materials and eight hours of labor, families in temperate climates around the world can install a biogas system that will convert the daily manure output of one cow into enough gas to power a single-burner stove for 3.5 to 5 hours.

Ready to build your own biogas digester? Learn more here.   

Viewing all 3123 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images